‘The Unseeing’ is fiction, spun around historical fact, set in the 19th century.
When Audrey Hart reads an advertisement for a collector of folk tales on the Isle of Skye she can’t help feeling that it was meant for her.
She had a difficult relationship with her father and her step-mother; she was in an awkward situation at the orphanage where she had been volunteering. Her mother, who had a particular interest in folklore, had disappeared, had been presumed to have had an accident, while out walking on Skye many years earlier.
It was hardly surprising that Audrey felt the pull of the distant island that she had visited as a very small child.
She won the job, but when she arrived on the island and met her new employer, Miss Buchanan, she came to realise that her work would be rather more difficult than she had expected. The Highland Clearances had forced many crofters to leave Skye, and and the few who remained were adamant that they would not repeat the old stories to her
That might have been because Audrey was an outsider from England; it might have been because they were obedient to the wishes of their minister, who was stern and strict and who preached fire and brimstone; but Audrey was sure that there were other, more sinister, reasons. The islanders seemed to be fearful of the consequences of having the tales that they could tell written down.
Then Audrey finds the body of a girl who had been missing washed up on the beach, when she learns that she is not the first girl who went missing on the island, she begins to realise that something is very wrong on the isle of Skye and in all probability that was what made the islanders fearful.
Her instinct was to act and to ask questions, but she didn’t know who she could trust, she didn’t know where she was safe, and she began to wonder if her new job was turning into a terrible trap …
Audrey drew me into the story. I liked her, I empathised with her situation, and as the story progressed I came to share her hopes and fears and understand what she wanted to do and what she wanted to find out. I didn’t always agree – and there were times when I worried about her and feared for her – but I did understand.
I appreciated that she was bright, she was curious, but there was only so much that she could do; because she was a woman of her time.
There were mysteries in Audrey’s past, and as the story moved forward I would learn why she had been so anxious to leave her her father’s and stepmother’s home, why she things had gone wrong at the orphanage, and even what had happened to her mother, all those years ago.
The story was well constructed, the pace was well judged, and once Audrey had drawn me there was a great deal to hold me there. Her world lived and breathed. I could hear the sea as she did, I shivered in the damp misty weather alongside her, and I I knew exactly how she felt as she ventured into new houses and across harsh and unfamiliar countryside. I appreciated the understanding of the history of the island and the way of life of the islanders; the writing was lovely and the descriptive prose, the pictures that the author painted, were wonderful.
I was disappointed that the end was a little too dramatic; but it held my attention because very final revelation came at the end of the book, it took me by surprise, and that the resolution of the story was satisfying.
I appreciated that this second novel sits well alongside its predecessor; and that it has exactly the right mix of things in common and things that make it different and distinctive. That said, I do think that the stronger colours of that first book suited Anna Mazzola rather better than the more muted tones of this one.
I found much to love though, and I am very interested to find out what the third novel will hold.
This is my current read. I’m enjoying it so far so we shall see what I make of the ending, though I already have my suspicions!
LikeLike
I’ll be interested to read your thoughts, Janet.
LikeLike
It is interesting to me, as a researcher into pretty much anything to do with narrative just how many societies protect their stories from outsiders. Their reasons may be different, but there is almost always that same feeling that story is something that is culturally personal and not just to be shared with anyone.
LikeLike
That is interesting. My experience is that too many people say too much, but of course I’m an available ear and not a researcher.
LikeLike
I thoroughly enjoyed reading your review and am looking forward to reading ‘The Story Keeper’ in the near future. Recently, I had the pleasure of seeing Anna Mazzola interviewed at a book festival and I put together some thoughts in a blog post afterwards: https://londonlifewithliz.com/2018/06/09/a-book-brunch-with-anna-mazzola-and-natasha-pulley/
LikeLike
It must have been lovely to see that pair of authors – I’ve loved Natasha Pulley’s first two novels- , and I hope you’ll enjoy this book as much as I did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Although I don’t really like historical fiction this sounds like a fascinating read, I have to say.
LikeLike
It was a cut above most books of this kind, but I suspect it would be a little too dark for you
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah – thank you!
LikeLike